Dec 15, 2018 08:42:44

Mobility and precarity

by @basilesamel PATRON | 337 words | 92🔥 | 92💌 | 0💧

Basile Samel

Current day streak: 92🔥
Total posts: 92💌
Total words: 36107 (144 pages 📄)
Broken streaks: 0💧

We can observe three kinds of nomadism throughout history: physical (historical nomadism), intellectual/spiritual (globalism or mercantile nomadism), and digital (not only digital nomads but also digital transformation as a whole). This three-dimensional nomadism is called neo-nomadism.

Neo-nomadism is everywhere in our sedentary societies. You can witness it in political nomads (migrants, refugees, homeless people...), workers (expats) or travelers. You can especially observe it in every trade flow around the globe shaping both economic and social phenomenon.

Unlike historical nomads, a neo-nomad does not belong to a given tribe. Sometimes those relationships are short-lived, limited to social networks. Deeply individualistic, he puts his freedom above others. It's a society where goods of consumption become transient (planned obsolescence), where a thirst for new material possessions prevails. Neo-nomadism serves the richest: people like me who travel to improve their quality of life, or for financial reasons (pay fewer taxes, tax evasion ...). On the other hand, political nomads end up without landmarks and are excluded (ie the European migrant "crisis").

Getting used to a new location takes time. Human beings strive for stability, but we consume in a way that favors everything ephemeral. Cities became temporary habitats where urbanization and urban misery (shanty towns) induce the rapid construction of new living spaces. In France, 1 household out of 3 has been occupying its apartment for less than 4 years. The average commute time never ceases to increase: 1 hour and a half per day in Paris. Workers became consumables. All of those behaviors combined induce unemployment and competition as an institution. Companies are compelled to adapt to the quest for profit and the strong competition resulting from globalization. Contracts, rather than laws. For example, delocalization provides a mean for more profit while ignoring basic human rights.

We favor competitivity and busyness, at what cost? Public institutions are closing. Mercantile nomadism serves the states and their citizens, but the market still prevails.

Globalism offers flexibility and freedom, but also cultural homogenization and precarity. How can we reconcile both? I want to think about an alter-nomadism.

From Basile Samel's collection:

  • 1

    @basilesamel "Human beings strive for stability, but we consume in a way that favors everything ephemeral." This is a profound statement that I need to think about for a while.

    Brandon Wilson avatar Brandon Wilson | Dec 15, 2018 17:22:21
    • 1

      @brandonwilson lol don't make it deep :P

      Basile Samel avatar Basile Samel | Dec 15, 2018 17:39:32
  • 1

    @basilesamel such an important issue to think about today. I'd say that the unfolding is happening right before our eyes as we bring companies like Uber, Google, and Facebook to court. How the world decides to regulate these huge influences in the corporate world could possibly set a precedent for others. Hopefully contractors can be well-protected!

    Victoria Maung avatar Victoria Maung | Dec 15, 2018 14:09:09
    • 1

      @vickenstein

      As an entrepreneur, I tend to think that you can't control the market. Money aligns everyone's interest.

      Companies evolve fast. Institutions, not so much.

      Basile Samel avatar Basile Samel | Dec 15, 2018 17:41:08
contact: email - twitter - facebook