loading words...

Jun 15, 2019 22:33:09

Gemfile #3: Bundle

by @craigpetterson PATRON | 237 words | 162🔥 | 163💌

Craig Petterson

Current day streak: 162🔥
Total posts: 163💌
Total words: 43141 (172 pages 📄)

This should close out my previous Gemfile posts with part 3. Potentially the final entry, but a lot of this is covered by Thoughtbot in 'A Healthy Bundle'

Thoughtbot talk about exact and pessimistic versions, as well as versionless. Whenever I start a new project, I try not to lock my gems to a specific version, but if they are being problematic it can help.

If you're using a standard setup for Rails, you're probably using Bundler. These version 'states' will affect how bundler handles your gem updates.

Running bundle update will have the following affects:

Exact: gem 'devise', '1.2.34' - no change

Pessimistic: gem 'devise', '~> 1.2' - updated to the latest PATCH version of 1.2.x, eg; 1.2.34

Versionless: gem 'devise' - updated to the latest version. Full stop.

Whatever time period you chose to upgrade in, you can see what needs to be upgraded by using bundle outdated

The default gem source for Rails is RubyGems.org, which is important to remember. Sometimes searching for a gem name could take you to the wrong documentation if the name is taken elsewhere.

When I pick what gem I'm updating, my priority is typically to open the changelog and inspect the changes. I've been bitten too many times by just upgrading a gem without doing this. Often, a gem might seemlessly upgrade, but introduce breaking or unknown consequences - you may have read my groans about adding tailwindcss to my application. The pain came from upgrading a major version of webpacker without following the major upgrade documentation.

contact: email - twitter / Terms / Privacy